An interesting case study of how the state became a pariah
The development of the suburban real estate market from 2015-17 did not follow the traditional "cat in the bag" approach but rather a new theory due to the conflicting requirements of the state and construction economy. Many factors contribute to a city's real estate market development, such as the urban area's size, the number of buildings per capita, the number of new homes built per capita, and the population in a specific location. Additionally, factors at the state and local levels affecting development include the location of real estate properties (e.g., apartment buildings, new housing developments) and the ability of development teams to independently decide the best path using online information. The "cat in the bag" method dates back to the 1980s, but in today's information technology era (referring to the early 2000s), it has become possible to independently assess factors contributing to the suburban real estate market's growth. What's the pattern? The answer is simple: the more developed a city's infrastructure, the more likely a specific property will be purchased using parcel technology. This process is quick and easy, taking about 5-7 weeks. For country houses, such a thorough assessment helps quickly identify the real reasons behind the market's condition. What can I say? At the state and local levels, there is a lot of information available, but focusing on easy data is challenging. Specifically, finding information about the exact features of territories and roads affecting the real estate market's development is difficult. Therefore, I recommend that only those who have completed at least one stage of private investment in the country (from B to D) or have access to public information technology—a private partner (in the case of investment) or a partnership—should proceed, having completed at least one stage of private investment. To date, there isn't a single "cat in a bag" case that hasn't already been covered. What should you do if you don't have a real estate agency? First, contact a real estate agency. Second, remember that most private developers often don't disclose the future housing building developer's name, as this is a criminal offense. A three-month prison sentence is not a problem. Finally, the maximum penalty with a fake passport is three months imprisonment. Yet, most private developers refuse to build any apartments in new housing projects. Why? Why do private developers face such adoption challenges?